Parsing and it’s classification in Compiler Design- Top down parsing/bottom up parsing/Crecursive
Parsing and it’s classification in Compiler Design- Top down parsing/bottom up parsing/Crecursive
Contents [hide]
- 0.0.1 Parsing and Its Classification in Compiler Design
- 0.0.2 What is Parsing?
- 0.0.3 Classification of Parsing
- 0.0.4 Top-Down Parsing
- 0.0.5 Recursive Descent Parsing
- 0.0.6 Predictive Parsing (LL(1) Parsing)
- 0.0.7 Bottom-Up Parsing
- 0.0.8 Shift-Reduce Parsing (LR Parsing)
- 0.0.9 Key Differences: Top-Down vs. Bottom-Up Parsing
- 0.0.10 Conclusion
- 1
Parsing and Its Classification in Compiler Design
- 1.1
What is Parsing?
- 1.2
Goal of Parsing:
- 1.3
Classification of Parsing:
- 1.4
1. Top-Down Parsing
- 1.5
2. Bottom-Up Parsing
- 1.6
Comparison Table
- 1.7
Summary:
- 1.8
Bonus:
- 1.8.1 Parsing and it’s classification in Compiler Design- Top down parsing/bottom up parsing/Crecursive
- 1.8.2 Compiler Construction – Lecture 5 – Top-Down Parsing
- 1.8.3 Lecture -1- : Types of parsers in compiler design
- 1.8.4 UNIT – II – Compiler Design – SCS1303
- 1.8.5 Types of Parse Trees
- 1.8.6 COMPILER DESIGN
- 1.1
Parsing and Its Classification in Compiler Design
What is Parsing?
Parsing is the process of analyzing a sequence of tokens (from lexical analysis) to check if they follow the syntax rules of a grammar. It helps in syntax analysis and is a crucial part of a compiler.
Classification of Parsing
Parsing is broadly classified into two types:
Top-Down Parsing
Bottom-Up Parsing
Top-Down Parsing
In top-down parsing, the parser starts from the start symbol (S) and tries to derive the input string step by step by applying production rules.
Types of Top-Down Parsing:
- Recursive Descent Parsing (Uses recursive functions)
- Predictive Parsing (Uses a parsing table, LL(1) Parsing)
Recursive Descent Parsing
- Uses recursive functions for each non-terminal.
- Backtracking may be required (which is inefficient).
Example:
For input id + id, the parser starts from E
and applies rules step by step.
Predictive Parsing (LL(1) Parsing)
- No backtracking required.
- Uses a parsing table to decide the next step.
- Works for LL(1) grammars (Left-to-right scan, Leftmost derivation, 1 token lookahead).
Example:
Grammar:
LL(1) table helps decide which production to apply next.
Bottom-Up Parsing
In bottom-up parsing, the parser starts with the input string and reduces it step by step to the start symbol using reverse derivations.
Types of Bottom-Up Parsing:
- Shift-Reduce Parsing (LR Parsing)
- Operator Precedence Parsing
Shift-Reduce Parsing (LR Parsing)
- Uses a stack to hold symbols.
- Shift: Push tokens onto the stack.
- Reduce: Replace a sequence of symbols with a non-terminal based on production rules.
- Common types: LR(0), SLR(1), LALR(1), CLR(1).
Example:
Grammar:
For input id + id, the parser shifts tokens onto the stack and reduces them using rules.
Key Differences: Top-Down vs. Bottom-Up Parsing
Feature | Top-Down Parsing | Bottom-Up Parsing |
---|---|---|
Start Point | From the start symbol | From the input string |
Direction of Parsing | Left-to-right derivation | Right-to-left reduction |
Backtracking | May require (in Recursive Descent) | No backtracking |
Common Techniques | Recursive Descent, Predictive Parsing (LL(1)) | Shift-Reduce Parsing (LR, SLR, CLR, LALR) |
Complexity | Easier to implement | More powerful but complex |
Conclusion
Top-Down Parsing is simpler but may not handle all types of grammars.
Bottom-Up Parsing is more powerful and can handle complex grammars.
Would you like an example of LL(1) or LR(1) parsing? Let me know!
Here’s a clear and concise explanation of:
Parsing and Its Classification in Compiler Design
Includes Top-Down Parsing, Bottom-Up Parsing, and Recursive Descent Parsing
What is Parsing?
Parsing is the process of analyzing a string of symbols (source code) according to the rules of a formal grammar.
It helps in:
- Checking syntax errors
- Converting code into a parse tree
- Guiding the compiler toward semantic analysis and code generation
Goal of Parsing:
To determine if the input string can be generated by the grammar and to produce a derivation or parse tree.
Classification of Parsing:
Parsing techniques are broadly classified into two categories:
Type | Direction | Works With |
---|---|---|
Top-Down Parsing | Left-to-right (L→R), builds tree from root | LL Parsers |
Bottom-Up Parsing | Left-to-right (L→R), builds tree from leaves | LR Parsers |
1. Top-Down Parsing
Definition:
Starts from the start symbol and tries to derive the input string using production rules.
Techniques:
- Recursive Descent Parsing
- Predictive Parsing (LL(1))
Process:
- Begin with the start symbol
- Expand non-terminals using productions
- Try to match input tokens
Issues:
- May suffer from left recursion
- Requires backtracking (unless LL(1))
Recursive Descent Parsing
- Uses one function per non-terminal
- Functions call each other recursively
- Easy to implement manually
- May involve backtracking
Suitable for:
- Small grammars
- LL(1) grammars
2. Bottom-Up Parsing
Definition:
Starts from the input string and tries to reduce it to the start symbol using reverse productions.
Techniques:
- Shift-Reduce Parsing
- LR(0), SLR(1), LALR(1), CLR(1)
Process:
- Shift tokens to a stack
- Reduce using grammar rules
- Continue until start symbol is reached
Advantages:
- More powerful
- Handles a larger class of grammars (LR)
Comparison Table
Feature | Top-Down Parsing | Bottom-Up Parsing |
---|---|---|
Direction | Left-to-right | Left-to-right |
Tree Construction | Root to leaves | Leaves to root |
Backtracking | May need it | Not required |
Handles Left Recursion | ||
Examples | Recursive Descent, LL | LR, SLR, LALR, CLR |
Summary:
- Top-Down → Start from root, expand down (predictive)
- Bottom-Up → Start from input, reduce up (more powerful)
- Recursive Descent → A hand-written top-down parser using functions
Bonus:
Would you like:
A diagram of parsing tree construction?
Practice problems with parse trees?
Video script or explainer?
Let me know what you’d like next!