Day 04Part 08-Implication operator with truth table concept of converse Cinverse and Contrapositive.

Day 04Part 08-Implication operator with truth table concept of converse Cinverse and Contrapositive.



play-rounded-fill play-rounded-outline play-sharp-fill play-sharp-outline
pause-sharp-outline pause-sharp-fill pause-rounded-outline pause-rounded-fill
00:00

 Implication Operator & Truth Table: Converse, Inverse, and Contrapositive

In propositional logic, the implication operator (→) is used to express a logical relationship between two statements. It is written as:

p→qp \rightarrow q

which is read as “If pp, then qq.

 Truth Table of Implication (p→qp \rightarrow q)

The implication statement p→qp \rightarrow q is false only when pp is true and qq is false; otherwise, it is true.

pp qq p→qp \rightarrow q
T T T
T F F
F T T
F F T

Key Takeaways:

  • If pp is false, the implication p→qp \rightarrow q is always true (because nothing is required from qq).
  • The only way p→qp \rightarrow q is false is when pp is true and qq is false.

 Converse, Inverse, and Contrapositive

 Converse of p→qp \rightarrow q:

  • The converse of an implication switches the hypothesis and conclusion: q→pq \rightarrow p
  • Example:
    • Original: “If it rains, then the ground is wet.” (p→qp \rightarrow q)
    • Converse: “If the ground is wet, then it rains.” (q→pq \rightarrow p) –  Not always true!

 Inverse of p→qp \rightarrow q:

  • The inverse negates both pp and qq: ¬p→¬q\neg p \rightarrow \neg q
  • Example:
    • Original: “If it rains, then the ground is wet.” (p→qp \rightarrow q)
    • Inverse: “If it does not rain, then the ground is not wet.” (¬p→¬q\neg p \rightarrow \neg q) – ❌ Not always true! (Ground could be wet from something else.)

 Contrapositive of p→qp \rightarrow q:

  • The contrapositive switches and negates both pp and qq: ¬q→¬p\neg q \rightarrow \neg p
  • Example:
    • Original: “If it rains, then the ground is wet.” (p→qp \rightarrow q)
    • Contrapositive: “If the ground is not wet, then it did not rain.” (¬q→¬p\neg q \rightarrow \neg p) –  Always true!

Key Rule:
 The contrapositive of a statement is always logically equivalent to the original statement.

 Truth Table for Converse, Inverse, and Contrapositive

pp qq p→qp \rightarrow q q→pq \rightarrow p (Converse) ¬p→¬q\neg p \rightarrow \neg q (Inverse) ¬q→¬p\neg q \rightarrow \neg p (Contrapositive)
T T T T T T
T F F T T F
F T T F F T
F F T T T T

Observations:

  • The contrapositive always matches the original statement.
  • The converse and inverse are logically equivalent but not necessarily true if the original implication is true.

 Practical Applications of Implication in Logic & Mathematics

Mathematical Proofs – Used in proving theorems (Direct & Contrapositive Proof).
Programming & AI – Logical condition checking in if-else statements.
Philosophy & Debates – Used to establish logical arguments.
Everyday Reasoning – “If you study, then you will pass” → “If you didn’t pass, you didn’t study.”

Would you like more examples or explanations?

Day 04Part 08-Implication operator with truth table concept of converse Cinverse and Contrapositive.

Truth Tables, Tautologies, and Logical Equivalences

THE CONDITIONAL TRUTH TABLE FOR THE …

B.Sc. Mathematics (Honours/Major) Class Note



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error: