Critical Section Problem With Two Process Solution (Algo-1) Deckers solution, Strict Alteration.
Critical Section Problem With Two Process Solution (Algo-1) Deckers solution, Strict Alteration.
The Critical Section Problem is a classic problem in operating systems and concurrent programming, where multiple processes need to access shared resources without causing data inconsistencies. One of the earliest solutions for two-process synchronization is Strict Alternation, also known as Dekker’s Algorithm (Algo-1).
Contents
Strict Alternation Solution (Algorithm-1)
Concept:
In the strict alternation method, processes take turns to enter their critical section by maintaining a shared variable turn
.
Algorithm
Let:
turn
be a shared variable that alternates between 0 and 1.P0
andP1
be the two processes.
-
Process P0:
-
Process P1:
Issues with Strict Alternation
Lack of Progress:
-
- If one process does not need to enter its critical section, the other process is still forced to wait, leading to unnecessary delays.
- Busy Waiting:
- The waiting process continuously checks the value of
turn
, leading to CPU wastage.
- The waiting process continuously checks the value of
- Not Truly Concurrent:
- A process can be blocked even when the critical section is available.
Improved Solution: Dekker’s Algorithm
To overcome the drawbacks of strict alternation, Dekker’s Algorithm introduces an additional mechanism using flags (flag[0]
and flag[1]
) to ensure mutual exclusion while allowing flexibility.
Would you like a detailed explanation of Dekker’s Algorithm or other alternative solutions like Peterson’s Algorithm?
The Critical Section Problem arises in concurrent programming when two or more processes need mutual exclusive access to a shared resource (like a variable or a file).
Here’s a breakdown of Algorithm 1: Strict Alternation and Dekker’s Algorithm, which are classic solutions for the two-process critical section problem.
✅ Goal of a Critical Section Solution
A good algorithm must satisfy the following:
-
Mutual Exclusion – Only one process in the critical section at a time.
-
Progress – If no process is in the critical section, one of the waiting processes can enter.
-
Bounded Waiting – No process waits forever to enter its critical section.
🔹 1. Strict Alternation (Algorithm 1)
This is the simplest solution but not efficient.
🔧 Idea:
A shared variable turn
is used to strictly alternate between processes.
⚠️ Drawbacks:
-
Fails the progress condition.
-
A process might have to wait unnecessarily even if the other process is not interested.
🔹 2. Dekker’s Algorithm
One of the earliest correct solutions for two processes using only shared memory and no special hardware.
🔧 Idea:
Each process expresses its desire to enter the critical section using a flag. If both want to enter, use the turn
variable to decide who gets in.
👨💻 Process P0:
👨💻 Process P1:
✅ Dekker’s Algorithm: Advantages
-
Satisfies Mutual Exclusion
-
Satisfies Progress
-
Satisfies Bounded Waiting
🧾 Summary
Feature | Strict Alternation | Dekker’s Algorithm |
---|---|---|
Mutual Exclusion | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
Progress | ❌ No | ✅ Yes |
Bounded Waiting | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
Efficiency | ❌ Inefficient (can block unnecessarily) | ✅ Efficient in terms of fairness |
Would you like a diagram, animation, or a code simulation to visualize these concepts better?