Three terminologies of Happened before Clock Transition-Causal Ordering and Concurrent
Three terminologies of Happened before Clock Transition Causal Ordering and Concurrent.
Happened Before Or Causal Precedence Logical Clocks And Causal Ordering Logical Time Lamport Clocks Causal Relationships In Distributed Computations Lamport Timestamp Distributed Systems Clocks Algorithms In Distributed Computing.
Causal Ordering Of Messages In Distributed System Which Event Is Concurrent With The Vector Clock Causal Ordering Example Lamport Clock Example Time, Clocks And The Ordering Of Events In A Distributed System Lamport Clock Vs Vector Clock.
Contents [hide]
- 0.1 Three Key Terminologies in Distributed Systems: Happened Before, Clock Transition, Causal Ordering, and Concurrency
- 0.2 Happened Before (→) Relation (Lamport’s Happened-Before)
- 0.3 Clock Transition (Logical Clocks & Vector Clocks)
- 0.4 Causal Ordering & Concurrency
- 0.5 Summary Table
- 0.6 Conclusion
- 1
1. Happened-Before Relation (→)
- 2
2. Clock Transition / Logical Clocks
- 3
3. Causal Ordering and Concurrent Events
- 4
Summary Table
Three Key Terminologies in Distributed Systems: Happened Before, Clock Transition, Causal Ordering, and Concurrency
In distributed systems, events occur in different processes that may not share a common clock. To understand the sequence of events, we use concepts like happened-before relation, clock transition, causal ordering, and concurrency.
Happened Before (→) Relation (Lamport’s Happened-Before)
- Defined by Leslie Lamport, this relation helps establish an order of events in distributed systems.
- Denoted as: A→BA \to B (Event A happened before Event B)
- Rules:
- Same process rule: If two events occur in the same process, the one that appears earlier in execution order happens before the other.
- Message passing rule: If event A is a send message event, and event B is the corresponding receive event, then A→BA \to B.
- Transitivity: If A→BA \to B and B→CB \to C, then A→CA \to C.
Example: If Process P1 sends a message to Process P2, then the “send event” in P1 happened before the “receive event” in P2.
Clock Transition (Logical Clocks & Vector Clocks)
- In distributed systems, physical clocks may not be synchronized, so logical clocks are used to track event ordering.
- Two main clock types:
- Logical Clocks (Lamport Timestamps): Each process maintains a counter that increments for each event. Message passing updates the receiver’s clock accordingly.
- Vector Clocks: Each process maintains an array of counters representing the logical time of all processes. This captures causality more effectively than Lamport timestamps.
Example:
- If P1 executes an event at T=5 and sends a message, P2 may adjust its time based on received information.
- If P1’s timestamp is T=5 and P2’s was T=3, after receiving the message, P2 updates its time to T=max(5,3)+1=6.
Causal Ordering & Concurrency
- Causal Ordering: Ensures that events are delivered in the order they were causally related. If A→BA \to B, then B cannot happen before A in any observer’s perspective.
- Concurrency (‖): If neither A→BA \to B nor B→AB \to A, then A and B are concurrent events. This means they are independent and do not affect each other.
Example:
- If P1 sends a message to P2 and then P2 responds, the second event is causally dependent on the first.
- If P1 and P2 perform independent computations without communicating, their events are concurrent.
Summary Table
Concept | Definition | Example |
---|---|---|
Happened Before (→) | Defines a partial order of events in distributed systems. | A process sends a message before another process receives it. |
Clock Transition | Logical clocks update based on event ordering. | Lamport timestamp updates to maintain event order. |
Causal Ordering | Ensures messages/events are delivered in a causal sequence. | A reply to a message must be received after the original message. |
Concurrency (‖) | Events are independent if they do not causally affect each other. | Two processes computing independently. |
Conclusion
These concepts are essential for ensuring correct event sequencing in distributed systems, preventing inconsistencies, and maintaining system synchronization.
Here’s a clear and concise explanation of the three fundamental terminologies used in distributed systems related to event ordering and time:
1. Happened-Before Relation (→
)
The Happened-Before relation, introduced by Leslie Lamport, is a way to define the order of events in a distributed system without a global clock.
Definition:
Event A → B (A happened before B) if:
-
A and B occur in the same process, and A comes before B.
-
A is a send event and B is the corresponding receive event in another process.
-
The relation is transitive: If A → B and B → C, then A → C.
Example:
Here, A → B → D because of message passing.
2. Clock Transition / Logical Clocks
Since physical clocks can’t be perfectly synchronized in distributed systems, we use logical clocks (like Lamport Clocks or Vector Clocks) to track the order of events.
Lamport Logical Clock Rules:
-
Every process increments its clock before each event.
-
When a process sends a message, it includes its current clock value.
-
On receiving a message, the receiver sets its clock to max(local clock, received clock) + 1.
Purpose:
Helps assign a timestamp to each event such that if A → B, then timestamp(A) < timestamp(B).
3. Causal Ordering and Concurrent Events
➤ Causal Ordering:
Event A is said to causally affect event B (A → B) if:
-
There is a cause-effect relationship (e.g., A sends a message that B receives).
-
All processes must respect the causal relationship while delivering events.
➤ Concurrent Events (A || B
):
Two events are concurrent if:
-
Neither A → B nor B → A holds true.
-
They happen independently and cannot affect each other.
Example:
Summary Table
Term | Meaning |
---|---|
Happened-Before (→) | Defines causal relationship between events in distributed systems |
Logical Clock Transition | Timestamps events to respect happened-before relations |
Causal Ordering | Ensures messages are delivered in the order they causally occur |
**Concurrent Events ( |
Would you like a diagram showing the difference between these relations using processes and events?